From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:56:47 -0000 Archived: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:56:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Quantum Mechanics Difficult To Grasp? Too Bad >From: Cathy Reason <CathyM.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:51:39 -0000 >Subject: Re: Quantum Mechanics Difficult To Grasp? Too Bad >>From: Albert Baier <albertgbaier.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:00:49 -0600 >>Subject: Re: Quantum Mechanics Difficult To Grasp? Too Bad >>So the quantum theorists can bugger off. Come back with some >>FACTS, and I'm ready to listen. >Congratulations Mr Baier. The steam-powered mechanical computer >from which you are sending your email, is it your own invention? Hi Cathy, Have to agree with Albert. The fanciful inferences drawn from a few Quantum `facts' - even Feynman was guilty - will, I think, eventually be explainable by down-to-earth physics. Maybe it'll be `tomorrows physics' but I don't think it will involve particles `knowing' when they are observed, which can even now be explained in other more `practical' ways. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp