UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Nov > Nov 24

Re: Photographer Captures Stunning Images Of UFOs

From: Bruce <Maccabee <brumac.nul>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:39:23 -0500 (EST)
Archived: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:37:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Photographer Captures Stunning Images Of UFOs

>From: Viktor Golubic <diverge247.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:06:34 -0500 (EST)
>Subject: Re: Photographer Captures Stunning Images Of UFOs

>>From: Bruce <Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:16:45 -0500 (EST)
>>Subject: Re: Photographer Captures Stunning Images Of UFOs

>>>Source: WelwynHatfield24.Co.UK>>http://tinyurl.com/6rgjgrh

>>>Friday, November 18, 2011
>>>Photographer Captures Stunning Images Of UFOs Above Hatfield
>>>By Paul Christian

>>>After our story about the Welwyn Garden City man who couldn?t
>>>stop seeing UFOs, a Hatfield resident has sent us a series of
>>>snaps which show unexplained lights in the sky.

>>>Photographer Jason Reeve took the dazzling pictures from outside
>>>his north-west-facing bedroom window, in Chantry Court, with a
>>>20-minute exposure.he images showed mysterious mushroom-shaped
>>>craft set against the starry night sky.
>>According to the news article he took a series of photos.

>>Wonder what they show.

>>I don't know what made the bright light but the images look like
>>classic type of lens flare or internal reflection of bright
>>light within the camera. The light may have been a UFO but its
>>shape may well have been different from the shapes of the

>It mentions a 20 minute exposure but the stars still appear as
>point sources. No movement or streaking is evident from the
>earth's rotation. Therefore, these images do not appear to have
>lengthy exposure times. Tests with the camera and interviews
>with the witness appear as the first line to this investigation.

>My guess is that these are indeed lens flares... perhaps, street
>lights or some other light sources are near the camera and
>diffracting into the lens from outside the field of view. The
>lens coating creates a thin film that can allow light scattering
>from obtuse angles well outside the regular field of view.

I know the report says it was a 20 minute exposure but as I
recall the original newspaper article said he _waited_ twenty
minutes which I interpret as meaning that he took a picture at a
normal shutter duration (fraction of a second to a few seconds)
and waited twenty minutes before looking at it.

This does not appear to me to be a 20 minute exposure.

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com