From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:49:15 -0400 Archived: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:56:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Was Ectoplasm Formed To Render Art In Clouds? >From: Michael M. Hughes<michaelmhughes.nul> >To: UFO UpDates<post.nul> >Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:46:21 -0400 >Subject: Re: Was Ectoplasm Formed To Render Art In Clouds? >>From: William Treurniet<wtreurniet.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates<post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:02:54 -0400 >>Subject: Was Ectoplasm Formed To Render Art In The Clouds? >>Pareidolia is often the explanation for unusual shapes seen in >>clouds. Nevertheless, I offer for your consideration a photo I >>took last August that presents a complex piece of art in the sky >>that may even tell a story. In my opinion, the odds that this >>particular scene was placed there somehow by some intelligence is >>higher than the odds that it was merely a chance arrangement of >>cloud material. >>http://www.treurniet.ca/cloudpics/skyscape.htm >And pareidolia is the obvious=97and only=97explanation here. And that's your choice, Michael. You would probably say the same to the people who see faces on Mt Rushmore. Oh wait, maybe you wouldn't. The faces (plural) look too realistic and out of place to be accounted for by erosion. A lack of knowledge about context does promote the diagnosis of pareidolia. Clearly, my proposed context in this case didn't carry any weight with you. William Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp