From: Cathy Reason <Cathym.nul> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:21:29 +0100 Archived: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:03:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Ufology And Psychiatry - Summary >From: Eugene Frison <cthulhu_calls.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:09:00 -0500 >Subject: Re: Ufology And Psychiatry - Summary <snip> >>And that's why I describe these examples of yours as anomalies. >>You've taken a ragbag of anecdotes and assumed they are >>representative of some systemic unreliabity. But there is just >>no evidence of this and plenty of evidence against it. >And that's why your ragbag of anecdotes description is >completely out to lunch. There is indeed a bag of evidence and >it is a pretty big bag, and contains a whole lot more than >anecdotes. Eugene - your grasp of logic isn't just out to lunch, it's gone off on a five-year safari. I have nothing to add to what David Rudiak has just posted concerning your notion of reliability. As for your evidence, I see nothing to challenge my earlier conclusion that it's a scattering of oddities propping up a mountain of guesswork. You're right about one thing - I have absolutely no idea what this theory of perception is that you're supposedly advocating, which I suspect probably makes two of us. The details of this mysterious theory appear to change by the minute. Apparently it owes nothing to Cognitivism, it does not depend on "operationalisms" (by which I assume you mean operationalized measurements), and relies on proof found at the bottom of mineshafts. Indeed I think a hole in the ground is the right place for it. But that's just my opinion. Cathy Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp