From: Viktor Golubic <Diverge247.nul> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT) Archived: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:38:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Socorro Again >From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:09:19 +0100 >Subject: Re: Socorro Again >Viktor dismissed the motion of the object against the wind with >the remark that the direction of the wind aloft does not have to >be the same as the surface wind. There is some truth in this, >but not enough. Martin, I don't work in absolutes terms only with probable solutions. In which case, it is perfectly fine to work with multiple solution models running in parallel. If I discuss one at a time it doesn't mean I'm ruling out others, merely focusing a thought. I didn't dismiss the motion but merely pointed out additional information that's relevant to a full understanding of that motion: That information coming from firefighters. That Socorro is nestled near a series of mountain range immediately west of the city is pertinent given the information in the Chapter 6 I provided. The wind is coming off those mountains downward and parallel into the city and thus can be subjected to the local topological and thermo-mechanic manifold as described in that chapter. That map of Rudiak's is too widespread to fill in the necessary details in the area of interest. Though its good to show the regional trend, it does not however have enough resolution in the area of interest. There simply isn't enough wind stations to provide that level of detail. And why I felt it important to convey how wind near mountain ranges can and does actually behave. Also, these stations can report average values over a given interval of time. let's not forget that Lonnie was interviewed not too long after the incident (maybe 1 to 2 hrs) on the local radio and was under considerable public pressure to maintain what he was then compelled to possibly say under the influence of a strong radio personality. That is what some of the locals will tell you if you interview them. Hynek and others were not the first to interview him! And, this does not mean I'm calling him a liar but pointing how stories can change when someone is suddenly forced into the spotlight of public attention. A prankster may also be less boastful given the rapidly unfolding drama. I'm not in any way saying everything fits but entertaining what I know is conceivably possible having done considerable ground investigation work. And, it just so happens some in that same area. The statements I already provided on other points don't have to be repeated. Regards, Viktor Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp