UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Aug > Aug 31

Re: Conspiracy Theories

From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:06:30 -0400
Archived: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:59:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Conspiracy Theories


>From: Nick Pope <nick.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:50:16 +0200 (CEST)
>Subject: Conspiracy Theories

>Though ufology hardly gets a mention, this major new article on
>conspiracy theories may be of interest to list members, as
>theories concerning government cover-ups are inextricably linked
>with ufology:

>http://tinyurl.com/9hdgs6w

>The article was first published in the summer 2012 issue of The
>Skeptic Magazine (UK), but I've kept things even-handed and
>stress the positive aspects of conspiracy theories, as well as
>some negative ones. The feature is an overview of the genre, and
>while there's brief mention of several individual conspiracy
>theories, I focus on the wider issues raised.

This article is ironic given Nick's own recent foray into
propagating a conspiracy theory concerning an alien invasion
during the recent olympic games. His motivation for doing so,
stated after-the-fact, is irrelevant here, since most people
were not aware of that at the time. So I don't see Nick as an
unbiased critic of conspiracy theories.

Nick accepts the role of science in debunking conspiracy
theories such as in the spraying of chemtrails; i.e., spraying
from 35,000 ft would have low accuracy and have negligible
effects on the ground.  But he neglects to mention that
scientific principles can also show that the official
explanation of controversial events are wrong. This is the case
for the events of 911, for example. In that case, the Official
Conspiracy Theory is demonstrably magical in that it does not
explain the rapid disappearance of the buildings, the paucity of
building material on the ground afterwards, and the fact, as
shown in photos taken from high in the sky, that much of the
building material blew away rather than falling to the ground in
large chunks on or near the building site. When the mainstream
media studiously ignore such issues, what rational person would
look to them for unbiased reporting in general?

Nick belittles as "extreme" the idea that some new technology,
i.e., "some sort of anti-gravity weapon", may have been
responsible for bringing down the buildings. The evidence that a
generally unknown technology might have been used was documented
by Dr. Judy Wood in her book, "Where did the towers go?". Her
analysis was the only serious attempt at a comprehensive
scientific analysis of what happened to the twin towers. To
account for all the observed anomalies, she concludes that a
relatively low-power weapon based on the Hutchison effect was
involved in bringing down the buildings. This technology would
have reduced the forces holding materials together and caused
the building infrastructure to disintegrate.

I discuss some evidence for a technology that can reduce
molecular binding force in the following article:

Circumstantial Evidence For A Technology That Disrupts Cohesion
Of Matter

http://www.treurniet.ca/physics/mbftech.htm

I discuss further evidence in the following article that a covert
science and technology is under development around the world:

Is Covert Technology Used To Create Balls Of Light In The Sky?

http://www.treurniet.ca/bigpic/orbtech.htm

The testing of this technology was captured on video, and is
manifested as white orbs that can move very rapidly in the sky
as if controlled from the ground. These orbs are also used to
create more complex 3D shapes in the sky. No one is talking
about this technology, so it is relatively unknown.

So what Nick considers an extreme idea for bringing down the
twin towers could easily have been the leading edge of military
R&D in a number of countries.

The undercurrent in Nick's article is that people should just
stop thinking. It is telling the conspiracy theory world,
"There, there, don't worry, let daddy take care of it." Let our
formal government inquiries tell you what happened. Nick should
also have said, "Until the official explanations stop being
selective with the facts, there will be conspiracy theories".


William



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com