From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:58:32 +0000 (GMT) Archived: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:16:31 -0500 Subject: Re: Trent Photos Deemed 'Hoax' >From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:16:49 -0500 (EST) >Subject: Re: Trent Photos Deemed 'Hoax' >>From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:39:28 -0800 >>Subject: Re: Trent Photos Deemed 'Hoax' >>>Tony Bragalia has 'determined' that Trent hoaxed his photos >>>because more photos on the same roll of film* show his 9 year- >>>old son standing on a ladder in the same yard with the same >>>cloud cover. ><snip> >>>*Note that one commenter to Bragalia's Blog stated that the shot >>>of Trent's son was taken by Life magazine not Trent. >>More than one commentator on Bragalia's blog and >>ufocon.blogspot.com has noted that the shot of Trent's son was >>in fact taken by the LIFE photographer. I likewise noted that >>FACT over on Kevin Randle's blog today. >>The LIFE Trent photoshoot used to be on Google images, but has >>been removed for some reason. The Trent son on the ladder was >>clearly part of the photoshoot, complete with the LIFE >>"watermark" at the bottom of the photo. >>So far Tony Bragalia has not acknowledged he is dead wrong about >>this. >I agree that the "ladder shot" was by the LIFE photographer who >took many pictures of the Trents and their house and nearby >scenery. >David Rudiak has presented his typically erudite response to >Bragalia and Randle. Here is my response... written years >before Bragalia and Randle leapt into the "McMinnvile Photo >fray". >See: >http://www.brumac.8k.com/trent2.html >and two related papers with mostly technical details: >http://www.brumac.8k.com/trent1.html >http://www.brumac.8k.com/trent1b.html >Unlike the critics, I spoke numerous times with Evelyn Trent >during the main period of my investigation (1974 - 1977, 1980 >approx). <snip> >After all is said and done I would say to the >skeptics, believe what you will. >As for me, IMHO it was real. I am hearing rumours that certain researchers, one of whom is no stranger to this List, are on the brink of publishing an analysis which they believe is proof of a hoax. I have it on the authority of a third party - a 'usually reliable source' - that cunning digital enhancement has revealed the presence of a string or wire support. Since several people over the years have tried to find such a thing, without success, it will be interesting to see what the new claim amounts to. Martin Shough Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp