From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:13:49 -0400
Archived: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:30:19 -0500
Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes?


>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:59:35 -0600
>Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes?

>>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:38:59 +0000
>>Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes?

>>>From: Robert Hastings <ufohastings.nul>
>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:43:34 -0500 (EST)
>>>Subject: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes?

>>>My latest article is up at The UFO Chronicles:

>>>http://tinyurl.com/7dqy29z

>>>Yet Another Nuclear Missile Launch Officer Talks about UFOs at
>>>F.E. Warren AFB:

>>>Did the Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes?

>>><snip>

>>>To summarize, here we have yet another former ICBM launch
>>>officer saying that UFOs have repeatedly monitored and=C2=97according
>>>to missile maintenance and targeting personnel=C2=97tampered with our
>>>nuclear missiles.

>>>The latest missile-disruption incident at F.E. Warren AFB,
>>>according to two recently retired maintenance technicians,
>>>occurred on October 23, 2010. In other words, despite blanket
>>>denials from the Air Force, UFO activity at U.S. nuclear missile
>>>sites continues to nearly the present day.

>>Robert:

>>I always enjoy reading your reports. You act as a reporter; just
>>reporting the facts and leave analysis up to the reader.

>>So, as a reader of your latest report, I have a question: why
>>the hell would a so-called ET civilization be interested in
>>erasing missile tapes and monitoring maintenance of nuclear
>>missiles? To me doing so reeks of possible enemy combatants
>>spying on our facilities.

>>Yeah, I know foreign technology has been ruled out. The general
>>line is that nobody has technology capable of doing the things
>>to missiles that are being reported. Who is that sure where of
>>they speak?

>>I just have a problem with ET intervention into our missile
>>sites. I am sure you have your reasons for thinking ETs are
>>interested.

>>I guess I need to hear a really sound argument.

>This is the sort of thing that drives me nuts.

>(1) The issue is a UFO report, not speculation about ETs.

>(2) What in the world qualifies you to know what the ETs - you
>know, the ones nobody but you is talking about - would or would
>not do?

>This kind of silliness is one good reason why UFO-related
>discussions so seldom get anywhere.

>What a load of tiresome nonsense. One would like to think we're
>not children here, but sometimes I can't help fearing the worse.
>This is one of those occasions.

Hi Jerry,

There has always been a strong hint of electro-magnetic energy
associated with this phenomenon so erased tapes could just be a
by-product of the phenomenon's presence. And the tapes didn't
need to be erased; just corrupted to make them useless. Micro-
wave activity (possibly broad-band in nature) has been evident
as well.

EMP could be a possibility depending on what drives this
phenomenon.


Don Ledger


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.