From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:13:49 -0400 Archived: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:30:19 -0500 Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes? >From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:59:35 -0600 >Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes? >>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:38:59 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes? >>>From: Robert Hastings <ufohastings.nul> >>>To: <post.nul> >>>Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:43:34 -0500 (EST) >>>Subject: Did Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes? >>>My latest article is up at The UFO Chronicles: >>>http://tinyurl.com/7dqy29z >>>Yet Another Nuclear Missile Launch Officer Talks about UFOs at >>>F.E. Warren AFB: >>>Did the Unknown Intruders Erase ICBM Target Codes? >>><snip> >>>To summarize, here we have yet another former ICBM launch >>>officer saying that UFOs have repeatedly monitored and=C2=97according >>>to missile maintenance and targeting personnel=C2=97tampered with our >>>nuclear missiles. >>>The latest missile-disruption incident at F.E. Warren AFB, >>>according to two recently retired maintenance technicians, >>>occurred on October 23, 2010. In other words, despite blanket >>>denials from the Air Force, UFO activity at U.S. nuclear missile >>>sites continues to nearly the present day. >>Robert: >>I always enjoy reading your reports. You act as a reporter; just >>reporting the facts and leave analysis up to the reader. >>So, as a reader of your latest report, I have a question: why >>the hell would a so-called ET civilization be interested in >>erasing missile tapes and monitoring maintenance of nuclear >>missiles? To me doing so reeks of possible enemy combatants >>spying on our facilities. >>Yeah, I know foreign technology has been ruled out. The general >>line is that nobody has technology capable of doing the things >>to missiles that are being reported. Who is that sure where of >>they speak? >>I just have a problem with ET intervention into our missile >>sites. I am sure you have your reasons for thinking ETs are >>interested. >>I guess I need to hear a really sound argument. >This is the sort of thing that drives me nuts. >(1) The issue is a UFO report, not speculation about ETs. >(2) What in the world qualifies you to know what the ETs - you >know, the ones nobody but you is talking about - would or would >not do? >This kind of silliness is one good reason why UFO-related >discussions so seldom get anywhere. >What a load of tiresome nonsense. One would like to think we're >not children here, but sometimes I can't help fearing the worse. >This is one of those occasions. Hi Jerry, There has always been a strong hint of electro-magnetic energy associated with this phenomenon so erased tapes could just be a by-product of the phenomenon's presence. And the tapes didn't need to be erased; just corrupted to make them useless. Micro- wave activity (possibly broad-band in nature) has been evident as well. EMP could be a possibility depending on what drives this phenomenon. Don Ledger Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp