UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Feb > Feb 10

Re: Those "Noises" And MSM

From: albert baier <albertgbaier.nul>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:09:22 -0600
Archived: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:48:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Those "Noises" And MSM


>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:15:38 -0000
>Subject: Re: Those "Noises" And MSM

<snip>

>To return to our quake figures - several folk are producing
>charts (independent of USGS who strangely stopped providing that
>facility some years ago) which show an increase in larger quakes
>(c. MAG 7?) over last few decades. Some of them (sort-of hockey-
>.stick charts) are regularly featured by George Ure at
>http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm and I should say that I
>personally got similar results from the now defunct USGS "make
>you own charts" facility (iirc - using a 30 year setting and
>limits of MAG 3 or 4 to MAG 7 or 8), although that was about ten
>or so years ago.

<snip>

Ray,

Your mention of earthquakes and the USGS reminds me of some
information I found in the Brother Jonathan Gazette, an e-zine by
Marshall Smith, now defunct. He mentions some research he did on
earthquake prediction, IIRC, in the 90's. Smith discovered a
correlation between the High Moon and Low Moon, and the
frequency of large magnitude 'quakes. High or Low moon refers to
its position relative to the ecliptic. The combination of High
(or Low) moon and Full moon was especially critical. He even
wrote a program to display the results. Naturally, he was
excited to share his findings, so he wrote to the USGS. Not only
was his theory totally ignored, but the USGS removed large
magnitude quake data from its website. Today, I find next to
nothing about this on the Web. Smith claimed >80% accuracy in
his predictions, which is far better than the USGS could ever
do, yet they keep plodding their well-worn path. When you think
about it, it makes sense. If the moon can move billions of
gallons of water, it should also affect the crustal plates. Why
was this not studied years ago? Why did the USGS not immediately
quash this heresy with scientific facts? Sadly, information like
this could save many lives.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Smith got the same response as
I did when I posted the links to D.L. Hotsons papers here a
short while back. Hotsons theory represents a paradigm shift in
physics, just as Smiths did in geology, yet both are totally
ignored.

"If I have seen further than others, it's because I peeked past
the giants who were blocking the light" - Petr Beckmann

The truth is out there, but you gotta dig like hell for it.


Albert




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com