From: Gerald O'Connell <goc.nul> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:39:14 -0000 Archived: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:46:22 -0500 Subject: Re: UFO Morphology Issue Revisited >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:41:00 +0000 >Subject: Re: UFO Morphology Issue Revisited >>From: Gerald O'Connell <goc.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:54:11 -0000 >>Subject: Re: UFO Morphology Issue Revisited >>>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >>>To: <post.nul> >>>Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:08:19 -0000 >>>Subject: Re: UFO Morphology Issue Revisited ><snip> >Gerald & Martin: >What I always find strange is that individuals who have never >had - or admitted to - interaction with an unknown phenomena >decide that they can discuss the parameters of the event. How >the hell would some one who has never experienced a more or less subjective event know how the emotions and psyche is affected. <snip> Same way doctors treat diseases they have never had, men without pilot's licences design aircraft, men without wings fly them, and the army of people who put men on the moon had never been to the moon. Direct experience is generally overrated: if nobody had ever done anything they hadn't done before then nothing would ever have been done. Gerald O'Connell http://www.saatchionline.com/gacoc Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp