UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Jan > Jan 14

Re: Participation In Psychology Dissertation Study

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:03:53 -0000
Archived: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:10:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Participation In Psychology Dissertation Study

>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:21:43 +0000
>Subject: Re: Participation In Psychology Dissertation Study

>What I struggle to see is what damage this can do to Ufology,
>which is why I don't understand the apparent revulsion and/or
>suspicion expressed by the three of you.

Hello Joe,

Your wish for a wide-ranging and informative check of 'interest,
knowledge and representation in the population' does you credit
and is entirely admirable.

Calmly looking at the proposal let's see if they plan to a) use
a true cross-section of the population; b) impartially check
interest, knowledge and conclusions about UFOs in the

"Participants are requested for a Psychology dissertation
research study, exploring how our beliefs affect the way we
process new information.

This is a new study which will hopefully develop further
understanding in UFO belief, specifically with regard to some
UFOs having an extraterrestrial cause. Whether you believe, are
sceptical, or are unsure. this study is for you!" -

We can see that the answer is "NO" to both questions.

a) they could more reasonably have divided the population into
i) informed pro-UFO folk; ii) un-informed pro-UFOers
(believers); iii) informed skeptics (debunkers), iv) un-informed
skeptics (disbelievers). Instead they've chosen to class all
who've formed a pro-UFO conclusion as 'believers' (perhaps
hinting at an assumption that "UFOs don't exist"); that's an
agenda to label all pro-UFO folk regardless of the source of
their conclusions.

b) they only intend to "explore how our beliefs affect the way
we process new information". Therefore, given that they have
purposely mis-labelled half of the pro-UFO cohorts as
'believers' (see above), you can only expect further
misrepresentation from _any_ testing under that protocol.

If they continue with that plan then, using my 'test' for
outcomes -


I suggest we will see only a skewed and uninformative set of
partial results lending itself (purposely?) to media


Ray D

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com