From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:22:20 +0000 Archived: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:56:29 -0400 Subject: Re: Hastings' Follow-Up On 'Chasing UFOs' >From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:13:10 -0400 >Subject: Re: Hastings' Follow-Up On 'Chasing UFOs' >>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:13:46 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Hastings' Follow-Up On 'Chasing UFOs' >>>From: Robert Hastings <ufohastings.nul> >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>>Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:48:56 -0400 (EDT) >>>Subject: Hastings' Follow-Up On 'Chasing UFOs' >>>Nat Geo's Chasing UFOs: Two of the Stars Say the Show was Hijacked >>>"I know how disappointed all of you are. I am too. It's not the >>>show that was sold to both myself and scientist Ben... [It] does >>>get a bit better further down the road but not a lot." --James Fox >>>"James and I both had expectations and (for our own reasons) >>>hopes of an ultimately serious product. We both saw the project >>>heading in a different direction as time went on and were >>>powerless to influence it." --Dr. Ben McGee >>>My last article on this website, Nat Geo's Chasing UFOs: >>>Investigation As Farce, roundly criticized the format and >>>content of the new reality series currently being aired on the >>>National Geographic channel. >>>Having meticulously investigated UFO activity at nuclear weapons >>>sites for 39 years - utilizing declassified U.S. government >>>documents and the testimony of more than 130 military veterans - >>>I was appalled by the ridiculous thrashing around in the dark >>>and superficial-to-non-existent analysis by the trio of >>>"investigators" offered up in the program's first three >>>episodes. >>>More: >>>http://tinyurl.com/7exfskd >>Surely anybody who has been around this business should be surprised >>at this latest attempt to analyze the phenomena in any serious way. >>Just pretending the approach is serious, doesn't make it serious. >>Instead of taking "their" analysis seriously, we should write >>critiques pointing up how ludicrous the "documentary" is and the >>lack of competency of the film makers. National Geographic is >>not above being incompetent. >The explanation may be other than mere incompetence. Emphasizing >the fear factor is something I expect now from National >Geographic, after seeing their documentary on the technologies >and strategies available to counter an alien invasion. >I discussed in an earlier post how Nick Pope's warning of an >alien invasion at the London Olympics follows that same meme >quite nicely. >http://www.ufoupdateslist.com/2012/jun/m10-001.shtml >There seems to be a movement afoot to scare as many people as >possible (e.g., by "ridiculous thrashing around in the dark") in >preparation for some event related to UFOs, perhaps to do with >the Olympics. >Who stands to gain? I think the rule is to follow the money. William: Of course the ring master of this game wants people to react the way they want them to react. Scared! We the public can react the way we want. Has the BBC gone into the streets to interview people to find out what they think. I doubt if "aliens - ETS" - would be named as the threat. I would guess people who look middle eastern would be the targets. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp