From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:37:17 +0000 Archived: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:02:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Chase Brandon >From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:34:20 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Chase Brandon >>From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:10:38 -0300 >>Subject: Chase Brandon [Was: Files Released By U.K. ><snip> >>Disinformation is not uncommon. >True enough, Mr. Friedman. We should indeed proceed with great >discretion when reviewing information provided by the >intelligence community. >As a matter of fact, I am strongly of the opinion any such >information not accompanied by verifiable conclusive evidence >should be granted no greater status than suspension of judgment >pending further investigation. I feel this is a reasonable >perspective whether the unverified claims support or detract >from the likelihood an alien craft crashed at Roswell - or >virtually any other subject matter current and former Agency >personnel publicly address while paradoxically stating they >cannot discuss. >Do you (or others) agree with my opinion? If not, why not? Jack: Having socialized in glamourous venues with card carrying spooks, let's say I have a little more insight than the general public into the mindset of spooks, people whose job it is to run covert games on the public. Long ago, at the beginning, there were reports from field agents discussing how to use, manipulate the public using an event already coalescing within the fringe of the public's mind. It had to be something in an embryonic stage. Enter "ufos". It was perfect according to the reporting agents. And, guess what, there were people hungry to be "accepted" as experts. The agents reported how easy it was to manipulate these people. Some of 'Experts' had decided to try to make a living at lecturing on the subject. The best ones to control, thought the agents. Now, after all these years there are no background checks, no - at least two sources - to verify information. And, I an not referring to two people in the same household saying the same thing. I am not going to go into why Brandon was was easy to spot. Here's the most outrageous thing I am going to say: I don't know if the guy actually worked for any prominent government agency. A private public relations firm, maybe. But, I am not going to get all bent out of shape because many UFO 'investigators' bought Col. John Alexander's line - hook, line and sinker. He is good and always comes through with what looks like a seamless case and produces what his bosses pay for. One would have had to follow the Col. for years to know who the guy is and just how good he is. But, folks, he doesn't always shoot straight. I keep wondering how long it will take before Americans realize their covert agencies are just as shifty and sometimes corrupt as any other covert agency anywhere in the world. UFOs are a godsend. Because there never is any hard evidence, it is a perfect cover. What a wonderful rabbit hole for those humans who enjoy slithering down rabbit holes. I have found sliding down the rabbit hole - depends on the company - is conducive to smoking a really good cigar and listening to some really outrageous story. Do I always buy into the story? Well, there are people who thought I was a "resident". There are people who thought I was "deep cover". I tried to tell them I was just an American taxpayer looking for somebody to buy me a drink and tell me a terrific story. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp