From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:31:56 +0100 Archived: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:48:18 -0400 Subject: Re: "Orthoteny" And The Great French Flap >From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:51:24 +0100 >Subject: Re: "Orthoteny" And The Great French Flap <snip> >However, it has to stay on my radar and in my bookmarks for >several reasons: >First, as Charles Fort repeatedly queried in his books, there >seems to be a dichotomy between our scientific picture of Earth >as a rotating (and orbiting) sphere in space, and incidences of >incoming (or visiting) aerial phenomena which _should_ be random >in timing and across the face of the Earth (according to that >picture) - but which in fact seem to operate to a geophysical >_and_ chronological pattern or patterns. <snip> Hello All, That off-the-cuff reply (enabled because I've done several searches of Fort's books in last few years) was my main impression at the time of answering. However, within a few hours was pointed to a short video, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArU9ziZFNP8 - "We are definitely not alone ..." which only held my interest because its introduction was by Graham Sheppard - http://tinyurl.com/cxvxsdt - who was mentioned in Tim Good's books. It goes on to describe Roy Dutton's theories, based on extensive research, concerning the timings and spatial patterns of UFO arrivals: their `flight plans'. Roy Dutton's theories are further outlined at: http://tinyurl.com/cxjebm3 'A Testable Astronautical Theory for UFO Events' - which is an interesting read. It also mentions the folk who've tested his theory, notably an Irish astronomer Eamonn Ansbro, see: http://tinyurl.com/3mznoa6 "Irish astronomer says he has successfully tracked UFO's - Says he can now predict when they will next appear" So we have a progression, from Charles Fort in the early 1900's, to Aime Michel in the 1950's, to Roy Dutton in the next few decades, and last to Eamonn Ansbro in 2011. All addressing the impression, gained from the evidence, that _some_ UFOs have geophysical and chronologial patterns of arrival. BTW - seems a caveat might be useful here: Recently have seen some folk using an old quote from Jacques Vallee, seen at: www.science-frontiers.com/sf073/sf073g16.htm to try to dictate what UFOs can and cannot be. Someone - think it was Admiral Hill-Norton - looked at the evidence and warned against falling into the trap of believing that all UFOs are operated by one type of being. I'd go further and extend the possibilities to include completely different entities, even of different material composition. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp