From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:20:57 +0200 Archived: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:48:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Flying Saucers - The Greatest Lie Ever Told >From: James Carrion <jcarrion.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:48:04 -0300 >Subject: Re: Flying Saucers - The Greatest Lie Ever Told >>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:39:38 +0200 >>Subject: Re: Flying Saucers - The Greatest Lie Ever Told >>James, >>There are differing opinions about the press release, among >>which a mere blunder of Colonel Blanchard who, in spite of that >>blunder, later became a four star General. But according to >>Walter Haut, he would never >have done that without a direct >>order. >>So, I stick to my version. >>But let's test yours again. According to you, there was no UFO >>at all. The press release and the balloon explanation were part >>of a highly sophisticated scenario to make the Russians believe >>that these flying saucers were an American super weapon. A >>weird super weapon which crashed and explained as a confusion >>with a balloon. Great scenario for the Russians, indeed! Sorry, >>that's total nonsense to me. >>There is another question, this time about you. What I cannot >>grasp, is how you could become international director of MUFON. >>Gildas Bourdais >It makes no sense to you because you don't understand anything >about Intelligence Deception operations. At the same time you >ignore my challenge to float your accepted theory by a military >historian or intelligence historian. Are you afraid of what you >may find out? Or perhaps your mind is so made up that nothing, >not even the truth, will change it. James, It's my turn to ask: do you know military or intelligence historians willing to buy your Great Lie story? Please give us names. >As to how I became the International Director of MUFON, I guess >what you are really saying is how could I have achieved that >position if I am not a diehard believer. If you read MUFON's >mission statement, it is "the scientific investigation of UFOs >for the benefit of humanity". When it comes to science, belief >should not factor in. >I left MUFON because the MUFON Board of Directors, like you, are >also a bunch of diehard believers that will not accept a non-ET >theory, even if focused on the specific timeframe of June - >August of 1947. Or as Clifford Clift, former International >MUFON Director so succinctly put it: "James left MUFON because >the truth he was seeking was not the truth the MUFON Board of >Directors was seeking." >>From what I have experienced so far posting on this List, these >same two standards of truth play out here as well. For my part, I try to apply only one standard of truth: well documented, studied and analysed facts. From that viewpoint, your Roswell story falls apart, like several others, recently. Such as the Body Snatchers, or Stalin and Dr Mengele. I am not surprised that you had to leave MUFON. Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp