From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:52:15 -0600 Archived: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 07:55:15 -0400 Subject: Re: Dating Arnold >From: Jerome Clark<jkclark.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:46:03 -0500 >Subject: Re: Dating Arnold >>From: Michael Tarbell<mtarbell.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:29:18 -0600 >>Subject: Dating Arnold [was: Flying Saucers - The Greatest Lie Ever Told] >>If you haven't already seen it, I highly recommend the ten-part >>series "The Positively True Story of Kenneth Arnold" at >>saturdaynightuforia.com, >>http://tinyurl.com/cgtlk9b >>which goes into great detail about this and other >>'inconsistencies', including outright fabrications, in the >>Coming of the Saucers version of Arnold's involvement in Maury >>Island affair. And while I suspect most or all of these were due >>to Ray Palmer, I have distinct unease with Arnold's apparent >>complicity in their publication. >I don't. Nor should anyone else. I knew Arnold, and his naivete >about Palmer lingered to the end of his days. >Arnold was an old-fashioned straight-shooter, Western variety. >Not just my opinion, of course. It was a view shared by those >who knew him, which gives them a step up on those for whom he is >no more than a target in print. >As I was working on the Maury Island entry for the encyclopedia >and examining the relevant materials, it occurred to me that >Arnold's honesty worked against him. He couldn't imagine that >anyone else wouldn't be as he was. >As for the belated effort to smear Arnold, it's just another sad >example of how ufologists love to eat their own. The examples >are too numerous to count. (Travis Walton and Jesse Marcel come >immediately to mind.) Sometimes it leads me to the sorry >conclusion that no one ever should report a UFO sighting to us. I presume you were unable to review the referenced material, as nothing here seems to address it. I assure you I have no interest in smearing Arnold, or anyone else. I definitely have interest in his original sighting account, which I think you would agree was the seminal event of 20th century UFO chronology. Given its significance, did you really expect anything less than microscopic scrutiny of this case, including all its principals and their adventures after- the-fact? I frankly have no concern whether a single line of The Coming Of The Saucers was anything but a fabrication of Palmer's. But perhaps you may understand that some might find it difficult to imagine that Arnold himself was equally unconcerned. I'm certain he knew his name was on it. Mike Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp