UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Jun > Jun 5

Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

From: Neil Morris <neil.nul>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:27:20 +0100
Archived: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:44:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle


>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>>From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:10:44 -0700
>>Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle


>>>Source: Kevin Randle's A Different Perspective

>>>Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>>>Philip Mantle, Roswell Alien Autopsy published by
>>>RoswellBooks.com, Edinburg, Texas, 293 pages with an index.

>>Kevin, EBK, List,

>>Philip and I are friends, but he's mistaken about the AA.

>>The UFO community has missed a great chance to understand the
>>UFO phenomenon by studying the AA and discussing the
>>implications of the footage.

>>Only a few researchers have viewed the uncut footage or tried to
>>figure out the significance of the Socorro crash site.

>>Everyone refuses to listen to Dr Leir and his insistence that
>>the footage is of a real creature.

>>How and why did John Humphrey, a left hander, play the part of a
>>right handed surgeon and why did he and Spyros show the brain
>>being removed from the rear when it was obviously removed from
>>the front?

>>These types of mistakes are ingored or overlooked in Philip's
>>research and by the vast majority of other UFO researchers.

>>And how did Ray Santilli describe and give directions to
>>a dry lake with burned vegetation and rocks, covered with a
>>strange blue melted material, eventually identified as
>>cristobalite? He has never been to Socorro.
>>These are only a few of the unanswered questions.

>>I think it's time for folks to take another look at the uncut
>>footage and the evidence that it is hoaxed. There are many dead
>>ends in Ufology, but the AA isn't one of them.

>Ed, List, All

>Let's see, Ray Santilli said that the "tent" autopsy footage
>was either faked by his friends as a joke or an attempted
>recreation of the footage because the original was too muddy,
>dirty, or dark to be aired. Which version do you believe and
>don't both of them lead to the single conclusion that it is
>faked?

>If there was original tent footage, as suggested by Santilli,
>that film, although useless for broadcast would have forensic
>value but none of it has ever been submitted for testing which
>leads to a single conclusion of fake.

<snip>

>Instead, we are asked to accept this as real because Santilli
>described a real place near Socorro, John Humphreys is left-
>handed and Roger Leir thinks the body is real.

>At what point do you realize the problem isn't that we all
>reject the autopsy (because of all the admissions of fakery
>involved), but your continued drumbeat that it is real...
>despite the deplorable lack of evidence on your side.

>Kevin


List,

You may find some of this evidence in this article I wrote
earlier this year.

http://es3.ph.man.ac.uk/~neil/Alien-Autopsy-Revisited.pdf

Here you will find examples of intercut footage, "I" beams with
and without glyphs and more than one body on the table, it's
worth the 2.5mbt download if I do say so myself.


Neil




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com