UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Jun > Jun 5

Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

From: Neil Morris <neil.nul>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:27:20 +0100
Archived: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:44:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>>From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:10:44 -0700
>>Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>>>Source: Kevin Randle's A Different Perspective

>>>Alien Autopsy And Philip Mantle

>>>Philip Mantle, Roswell Alien Autopsy published by
>>>RoswellBooks.com, Edinburg, Texas, 293 pages with an index.

>>Kevin, EBK, List,

>>Philip and I are friends, but he's mistaken about the AA.

>>The UFO community has missed a great chance to understand the
>>UFO phenomenon by studying the AA and discussing the
>>implications of the footage.

>>Only a few researchers have viewed the uncut footage or tried to
>>figure out the significance of the Socorro crash site.

>>Everyone refuses to listen to Dr Leir and his insistence that
>>the footage is of a real creature.

>>How and why did John Humphrey, a left hander, play the part of a
>>right handed surgeon and why did he and Spyros show the brain
>>being removed from the rear when it was obviously removed from
>>the front?

>>These types of mistakes are ingored or overlooked in Philip's
>>research and by the vast majority of other UFO researchers.

>>And how did Ray Santilli describe and give directions to
>>a dry lake with burned vegetation and rocks, covered with a
>>strange blue melted material, eventually identified as
>>cristobalite? He has never been to Socorro.
>>These are only a few of the unanswered questions.

>>I think it's time for folks to take another look at the uncut
>>footage and the evidence that it is hoaxed. There are many dead
>>ends in Ufology, but the AA isn't one of them.

>Ed, List, All

>Let's see, Ray Santilli said that the "tent" autopsy footage
>was either faked by his friends as a joke or an attempted
>recreation of the footage because the original was too muddy,
>dirty, or dark to be aired. Which version do you believe and
>don't both of them lead to the single conclusion that it is

>If there was original tent footage, as suggested by Santilli,
>that film, although useless for broadcast would have forensic
>value but none of it has ever been submitted for testing which
>leads to a single conclusion of fake.


>Instead, we are asked to accept this as real because Santilli
>described a real place near Socorro, John Humphreys is left-
>handed and Roger Leir thinks the body is real.

>At what point do you realize the problem isn't that we all
>reject the autopsy (because of all the admissions of fakery
>involved), but your continued drumbeat that it is real...
>despite the deplorable lack of evidence on your side.



You may find some of this evidence in this article I wrote
earlier this year.


Here you will find examples of intercut footage, "I" beams with
and without glyphs and more than one body on the table, it's
worth the 2.5mbt download if I do say so myself.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com