From: Don Ecsedy <don.nul> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Archived: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 06:22:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Dating Arnold >From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:30:04 +0100 >Subject: Re: Dating Arnold >>From: Don Ecsedy <don.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:42:09 -0400 (EDT) >>Subject: Re: Dating Arnold ><snip> >>What is surprising is that they didn't correct the error in the >>Analysis. It seems reasonable to assume at least one person >>would have noticed the jumble. >>Someone did make a change between the December 1948 and the >>April 1949 printings of the Analysis. They replaced the first >>photograph in the four-image grid of Rhodes' photos with a >>different crop of it. >OK. Did you find any changes anywhere in the text? I didn't look for any. At the time. I was looking for the photos, noted the July 29th "jumble", and moved on. I will compare the versions, though. Regards, Don http://www.foreshadower.net Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp