UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Jun > Jun 10

Re: Contacts Abductions & Convictions

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:01:22 +0100
Archived: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:18:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Contacts Abductions & Convictions

>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 06:37:14 +0100
>Subject: Contacts Abductions & Convictions


>Jacobs's accounts indicate that the 'invaders' contact and
>instruct  people mostly at night/mainly telepathically/and are
>deceptive and sometimes destructive BUT seem to follow a logic
>and a set of rules of their own.


>That is strangely like the histories of other-worldly encounters
>we find stretching back for millenia. Therefore, by following
>the ancient rules as laid down, modern experiencers could maybe
>protect themselves.

>History's rules: historical accounts say that religious
>'believers' can escape any danger by calling on their God. But
>the accounts also say that non-religious folk can also be immune
>IF they address the entity(s) logically, first asking for a
>name/identity, and then for a reason or motive for the
>visitation, and then proceeding rationally and dispassionately.


Hello List,

Received some off-list comment on that post, mostly approving.
Even so, am realizing that the subject deserved more

In particular, if we take those conclusions about the past - by
Vallee, Hynek, Keel, and now Jacobs - at face value, they raise
questions about probable lack of integrity (to say the least) in
our existing power structures - for instance in policing,
politics, judiciary and finance.

As we saw, it seems that individuals most prone to attack and
subversion by `entities' are those without strong ethics, and/or
without a good grounding in science, natural philosophy or maybe
even sound `husbandry' of one kind or another.  And, again
looking back at the folk-record, we see that persons seeking
gain or self-advantage in dealings with the `tricksters' almost
always end up in thrall to them, by various kinds of

That amounts to a double-whammy against the big-wheels in
policing, politics, the judiciary and finance (and media?), who
are notoriously deficient in knowledge _and_ ethics (because
their careers are built around the need for power, _not_ for
knowledge or even thought/meditation) and whose every action is
ruled by greed.

So, if Vallee, Hynek, Keel, and Jacobs are right about the
history of `abductions' and `interventions', what does that say
about the methods (probably non-humane), and the motives
(possibly non-human) of our leaders?

I.e. whose interests are they likely to be serving?


Ray D

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com