From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:01:22 +0100 Archived: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:18:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Contacts Abductions & Convictions >From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 06:37:14 +0100 >Subject: Contacts Abductions & Convictions <snip> >Jacobs's accounts indicate that the 'invaders' contact and >instruct people mostly at night/mainly telepathically/and are >deceptive and sometimes destructive BUT seem to follow a logic >and a set of rules of their own. <snip> >That is strangely like the histories of other-worldly encounters >we find stretching back for millenia. Therefore, by following >the ancient rules as laid down, modern experiencers could maybe >protect themselves. >History's rules: historical accounts say that religious >'believers' can escape any danger by calling on their God. But >the accounts also say that non-religious folk can also be immune >IF they address the entity(s) logically, first asking for a >name/identity, and then for a reason or motive for the >visitation, and then proceeding rationally and dispassionately. <snip> Hello List, Received some off-list comment on that post, mostly approving. Even so, am realizing that the subject deserved more examination. In particular, if we take those conclusions about the past - by Vallee, Hynek, Keel, and now Jacobs - at face value, they raise questions about probable lack of integrity (to say the least) in our existing power structures - for instance in policing, politics, judiciary and finance. As we saw, it seems that individuals most prone to attack and subversion by `entities' are those without strong ethics, and/or without a good grounding in science, natural philosophy or maybe even sound `husbandry' of one kind or another. And, again looking back at the folk-record, we see that persons seeking gain or self-advantage in dealings with the `tricksters' almost always end up in thrall to them, by various kinds of enslavement. That amounts to a double-whammy against the big-wheels in policing, politics, the judiciary and finance (and media?), who are notoriously deficient in knowledge _and_ ethics (because their careers are built around the need for power, _not_ for knowledge or even thought/meditation) and whose every action is ruled by greed. So, if Vallee, Hynek, Keel, and Jacobs are right about the history of `abductions' and `interventions', what does that say about the methods (probably non-humane), and the motives (possibly non-human) of our leaders? I.e. whose interests are they likely to be serving? Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp