From: Kentaro Mori <kentaro.mori.nul> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:49:12 -0300 Archived: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 07:59:47 -0400 Subject: Re: Interviewing Peruvian Military UFO Researchers >From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:58:09 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Interviewing Peruvian Military UFO Researchers <snip> >I am concerned, however, with events surrounding General >Bermudez, the CEFAA and the El Bosque Air Base incident as >reported by Leslie Kean. Such concerns include video footage >independently located of the specific incident in question and >contradicting conclusions Kean reported. Many additional valid >concerns, such as a lack of transparency and the failure to >produce video and analysis claimed to be on hand, surfaced and >were competently summarized any number of places such as UFO- >Blog. >It would be necessary for parties involved in the El Bosque case >to be fully accountable for their yet to be supported claims Indeed it's puzzling why the new CEFAA website has published no hint of analysis on the El Bosque case besides a translation of one of Kean's posts originally published on Huffington Post. On their multimedia section, there's also a low quality version of just one of the videos - which had been previously publicized. One would assume the official website of CEFAA would publicize and share original evidence and investigation on such trumpeted cases - trumpeted with heavy reference to CEFAA's alleged investigations on them. Perhaps even more puzzling is that at least one case featured on the previous version of the website, and promoted by some as "the best UFO photo ever" at the time, cannot be found on the new version of CEFAA's website. It's the El Yeso case, of which previously CEFAA also only published a translation of NARCAP's analysis. The translation of NARCAP's analysis can still be accessed directly: http://tinyurl.com/6srwtu6 But I couldn't find reference to El Yeso on the new website. Perhaps this is related to the fact the anomaly has been suggested as simply a reflection? http://tinyurl.com/7tqkymy Why not publish original evidence and investigation to support the claims they themselves have translated from English, and why remove reference to content from the previous version - even if it was just a translation? I hope CEFAA's official website is still to be updated with a lot more relevant material, so there may be finally an open and public review of their claims and conclusions. Kentaro Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp