UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Mar > Mar 3

Re: Inter-Dimensional Or Demonic

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:10:01 -0000
Archived: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:58:41 -0500
Subject: Re: Inter-Dimensional Or Demonic

>From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:30:33 -0800
>Subject: Re: Inter-Dimensional Or Demonic

>>From: Eleanor White <ewraven1.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:49:36 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Inter-Dimensional Or Demonic

>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:14:38 -0000
>>>Subject: Re: Inter-Dimensional Or Demonic


>>>However, have a memory of some clinician describing how his
>>>patient saw even his breakfast table - ie. cereal packets
>>>etc - as horrible and fearful.


>What I've read on the subject of blind-from-birth having their
>sight restored is that few ever feel totally comfortable with
>the images, finding them confusing and difficult to interpret.


>Exactly what this has to do with UFOs and aliens I'm not sure.
>Novel images and objects can certainly confuse us, but normal
>sighted people usually resort to metaphor to try to bridge the
>gap between the known and unknown. Therefore, the UFO/creature
>looked like, moved like, acted like, etc.


>What exactly is "demonic" anyway?

Hi David,

We've come full circle:

First, I don't think there's a single 'normal sighted person' on
this Earth who would be reliable when trying to describe
something which was truly alien to his/her learned perceptions.

As joint editors C.P. Snow (British Ministry of Technology),
Prof. Henry Margenau (Yale University), Prof. Ren=E9 Dubois (The
Rockefeller University) all agreed: "An examination of most of
the data of vision would reveal no examples of what could be
accurately called 'correct' perception." (in 'Light and

Second, at the start of this thread. I wrote: "been reviewing
some presentations with agendas. They all use the "para"
conclusions of folk like Mack and Hopkins, Hynek and Vallee, to
steer their readers/viewers to believe that unexplained
phenomena are either 'inter-dimensional' or 'demonic'" - and
then went on to hypothesize that we can only 'see' what's
already in our minds (from biological experiment and examples of
different paranormal experiences being determined by existing

In other words, if an alien 'plasma-being' were to materialize,
an MIT prof would 'see' an artifact - a saucer, or a robot etc;
a mid-European peasant would 'see' something from fairy tales -
a walking house or some such; while an Amazonian villager would
'see' a zoomorphic Forest God - a giant magical animal.

Don't forget: light is stopped by the back of the eye, so no
human brain has ever had a (true) optical view of the universe.


Ray D

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com