From: Robert Powell <rpowell.nul> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:53:43 -0600 Archived: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 08:22:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Let's Crank It Up A Notch - Cox >From: Gildas Bourdais<bourdais.gildas.nul> >To:<post.nul> >Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:03:14 +0100 >Subject: Re: Let's Crank It Up A Notch - Cox >>From: Robert Powell<rpowell.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:30:56 -0600 >>Subject: Re: Let's Crank It Up A Notch - Cox >>>From: John Harney<magonia.nul> >>>To:<post.nul> >>>Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:11:59 -0000 >>>Subject: Re: Let's Crank It Up A Notch - Cox >>>>From: Jerome Clark<jkclark.nul> >>>>To: post.nul >>>>Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:46:31 -0600 >>>>Subject: Re: Let's Crank It Up A Notch - Cox >>>>Leslie Kean would make a much-needed addition to the discussion. >>>>She's one of the smartest, most informed people around, with an >>>>impressive track record as investigator, author, and >>>>spokesperson for our subject. >>>If she's so smart, why did she include so many solved UFO cases >>>in her book, and present them with hardly any critical comment? >>>She seems to be unduly impressed by military uniforms with rows >>>of medals, and with academic gowns, when assessing UFO reports, >>>and she includes some contributions from persons notorious in >>>ufology for their lack of objectivity. >>>To take but two examples to start with, from the book UFOs: >>>1947-1997 (edited by Hilary Evans and Dennis Stacy, John Brown >>>Publishing, London, 1997): >>>In an article, The Belgian 1989-1990 UFO Wave, Belgian >>>researcher Wim Van Utrecht expresses his doubts about the >>>authenticity of the Petit-Rechain "flying triangle" photo, and >>>his suspicions have recently proved to have been justified. He >>>also provides plausible explanations for most (not all) other >>>sightings in this UFO wave. >>The Belgian wave is hardly dependent on the triangular photo >>that was apparently faked. Exactly what plausible explanations >>did Utrecht provide to explain the triangular objects witnessed >>by multiple Gendarmerie? >>>The article Trans-en-Provence: When Science And Belief Go Hand >>>In Hand, by Eric Maillot and Jacques Scornaux, is an excellent, >>>detailed demolition job on this notorious UFO "landing" and the >>>bungled investigations of it. >>Rather than make an assertion that some book demolishes the >>Trans-en-Provence case, perhaps you could give the reasons to >>this forum as to why that case is invalid? >In a few words, here are the main arguments of the skeptics on >Trans-en-Provence: <snip> Gildas, if John Harney wants to defend those claims then let's hear it from him. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp