UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > May > May 12

Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:31:40 -0300
Archived: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:02:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without


>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 20:17:51 +0000
>Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without Our Knowledge"

>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:31:47 -0300
>>Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without Our Knowledge"

>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>>>Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:02:50 +0100
>>>Subject: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without Our Knowledge"

>>>www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120508173511.htm

>>>[Quotation Begins]

>>>Emotion Can Shut Down High-Level Mental Processes Without Our
>>>Knowledge, in Our Native Language

>>>ScienceDaily (May 8, 2012) - Psychologists at Bangor University
>>>believe that they have glimpsed for the first time, a process
>>>that takes place deep within our unconscious brain, where primal
>>>reactions interact with higher mental processes. Writing in the
>>>Journal of Neuroscience, they identify a reaction to negative
>>>language inputs which shuts down unconscious processing.

>>>[more at page]

><snip>

>>Fascinating stuff, Ray. You on the right List? Ropes for snakes,
>>gnats for mosquitos perfect in detail as seen from the corner of
>>the eye. Are the rest of us - except KK - supposed to read
>>something into these revelations? If so you've never been in the
>>field have you?

>Yes, Don, every one should become aware of the development in
>cognitive processes. Especially, ufo researchers who rely only
>on "witness" reports. The human is - so far - the only recording
>devise involved in witness reports; that includes the
>interpretation of photos of distant objects claimed by the
>witness to be of ET origin. It could be argued that the
>subconscious mind is just filling in the gaps in witness'
>observation. How the hell would somebody be able to identify an
>object in the distant and know what it was. I just watched some
>space debris fall out of the sky. It happened in microseconds.
>Not much of observation time, but because on my background in
>astronomy, my mind filled in the details. Was that an accurate
>determination? Don't know. I went to my astronomy group looking
>for verification.


Yeah, sure, I can understand the resistance to the results of
new research into cognitive processes. We older adults became
used to thinking that what we saw was in fact the reality of the
situation. Now, we find out there are other factors involved in
coloring our 'reality'.

It's not resistance KK, the psychological interpretation is
bilge but a safety net for those who have some issues with some
other interference in their lives.

Not just witness but witnesses, sometimes many at a time. And
you forgot radar trackings, transponder interference an TCAS
triggerings; simultaneous air/ground confirmations of UFO
reports. Try to get the idea out of your head that these are hit
and and always at night.

You didn't respond to my theory that your willingness to accept
soft non-science as a cope-out for your apparent personal
interventions.


Don Ledger



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com