From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:33:59 -0700 Archived: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:10:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without >From: Ray Dickenson<r.dickenson.nul> >To:<post.nul> >Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 19:46:58 +0100 >Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without Our Knowledge" >>From: Don Ledger<dledger.nul> >>To:<post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:31:47 -0300 >>Subject: Re: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without OurKnowledge" >>>From: Ray Dickenson<r.dickenson.nul> >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto<post.nul> >>>Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:02:50 +0100 >>>Subject: Reality? - "Mental Processes Shut Down Without Our Knowledge" >>>www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120508173511.htm ><snip> >>Fascinating stuff, Ray. You on the right List? Ropes for snakes, >>gnats for mosquitos perfect in detail as seen from the corner of >>the eye. Are the rest of us - except KK - supposed to read >>something into these revelations? If so you've never been in the >>field have you? >Hello Don, >The accumulating evidence says that we cannot trust our brains: >they lie to us by ignoring `painful' words (when that can't >endanger us) and will lie again by creating non-existent shapes >(i.e snakes - when it might be advantageous). >Seems to me that should be considered as important by anyone >investigating witness perceptions of phenomena, especially high >strangeness phenomena. >Even if you happen to possess the one brain on the planet which >is unaffected by such influences. [Or thinks it is.] Here we go again. The problem isn't whether humans and their brains are fallible. The problem is exaggeration of human fallibility to the point where we literally "cannot trust our brains", apparently _ever_. I'm sure Ray can trust his brain 99% of the time as he no doubt gets through the day usually just fine, just like 99.9% of the human race probably gets through their day just fine without getting run over by buses or poisoned by food they shouldn't eat. 99% right will get you an A+ grade in school. It's pretty damn good, not perfect, but very much good enough. Again, if our brains were really as unreliable in all things as Ray continues to argue, the human race would not be here and we wouldn't be having the argument to begin with. Ray also continues to confuse raw perception with interpretation, and also makes no allowances for when we quickly correct our misinterpretations. That coiled rope seen out of the corner of his eye that Ray might momentarily interpret as a dangerous snake is actually a perfectly good and adaptive interpretation with the limited amount of observation time and data, and if it really were a snake might save his life. But getting a better look at it over a longer period of time, Ray quickly realizes it isn't a snake, and I'm sure he trusts that more detailed observation and resulting interpretation as being highly reliable - or does he? David Rudiak Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp