From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:02 +0000 Archived: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:58:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:11:12 -0400 >To: ufo-updates-list.nul >From: post.nul >Subject: UFO UpDate: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:07 +0100 >Subject: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >Hello List >To revisit this subject: >When CNES (French National Centre for Space Studies) released >its UFO files in 2007 it said that 28% of those reports were >unexplained. >http://www.cnes-geipan.fr/ >And today their site says 22% of ongoing reports are >'unidentified'. >In `UFO - Secret Access on the Record' >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTPFF-qhqf8 >(from about 59 mins) >We hear that after the Belgian wave, General Wilfried De Brouwer >said that of several thousand reports a total of 650 were >investigated and of those, 500 remained unexplained. That's >approximately 77%. >Yet the media in UK and USA continually claim that "only 5%" of >sightings are unexplained. Ray: Is it possible that CNES is making reference to its data file? KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp