From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:32:09 +0100 Archived: Sun, 20 May 2012 17:40:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:02 +0000 >Subject: Re: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:07 +0100 >>Subject: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? <snip> >>Yet the media in UK and USA continually claim that "only 5%" of >>sightings are unexplained. >Is it possible that CNES is making reference to its data file? Not sure - however there's several factors to the equation that most folk don't consider. i) how many reports - of all those available - are investigated; ii) how scientifically rigorous are the investigations; iii) how truthful are the people who make those results available to the public. Without being even half-way cynical I think we can be pretty sure that all US and UK gov't agencies have flunked on all three (publicly anway). Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp