From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 11:33:10 +0200 Archived: Mon, 21 May 2012 06:38:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:12:02 +0000 >Subject: Re: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >>Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:11:12 -0400 >>To: ufo-updates-list.nul >>From: post.nul >>Subject: UFO UpDate: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 05:12:07 +0100 >>Subject: Realistic Ratios Of Unexplained Sightings? >>Hello List >>To revisit this subject: >>When CNES (French National Centre for Space Studies) released >>its UFO files in 2007 it said that 28% of those reports were >>unexplained. >>http://www.cnes-geipan.fr/ >>And today their site says 22% of ongoing reports are >>'unidentified'. >>In `UFO - Secret Access on the Record' >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTPFF-qhqf8 >>(from about 59 mins) >>We hear that after the Belgian wave, General Wilfried De Brouwer >>said that of several thousand reports a total of 650 were >>investigated and of those, 500 remained unexplained. That's >>approximately 77%. >>Yet the media in UK and USA continually claim that "only 5%" of >>sightings are unexplained. >Ray: >Is it possible that CNES is making reference to its data file? >KK Of course, yes! Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp