From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Archived: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:53:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Alexander Contradictions & Unanswered Questions >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:25:07 +0000 >Archived: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:55:59 -0400 >Subject: Re: Alexander Contradictions & Unanswered Questions >>From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:26:51 -0700 (PDT) >>Subject: Alexander Contradictions & Unanswered Questions >>Some may find my latest blog post of interest, John Alexander, >>Contradictions and Unanswered Questions: >>http://tinyurl.com/bwwynro >>The post explores such circumstances as military intelligence >>personnel in ufology, the often contradictory statements of the >>players and the Carpenter Affair, among others. >Jack: >I come to the investigation of UFOs from years of researching >mind control - years before the concept entered the public >dialog. I brought to the attention - in a national magazine - >techniques and policies of the practice of mind control by >mostly private corporations tasked and funded by government >agencies. >My path crossed Col. Alexander's a couple of times. He seemed to >be everywhere: mind control, non-lethal weapons, remote viewing. >Years into my research, I found that my research path crossed >over into the UFO community. While researching background >material for a book I wrote, I found documents that showed >people behind the scenes both mind control and shaping the >direction of ufo investigations. >I don't just read UFO material, but actual documents supporting >what I am averring. >I am satisfied that 80% of what I am putting forward is correct. >All I have to do is look back on just how correct my research >was in the mind control field. It seems I am about 15 years >ahead of the curve. I will simply wait out the time it takes the >UFO community to catch up with the conclusions I have come to. Hello KK, Thank you for your comments; they are appreciated. As I am confident you understand, your remarks inspire many thoughts of which I could discuss at length. For starters... I have of course not reviewed all of your work - but I am relatively familiar with some of it. I am aware, for example, that you delved extensively into issues surrounding covert mind control research and the use of involuntary human research subjects. As a matter of fact, I have read some of your writing about Alexander, including your profile of him authored around his May, 1998, lecture in Encinas, CA. I feel as if I can very much understand your interest in such subject matter. I also admire and respect your efforts. On a side note, I have read some of your work on the analysis of the literature and film surrounding the infamous alleged alien autopsy. I found your comments quite interesting, and as can sometimes be the case, reading your work introduced me to a chain of events that could in itself become a virtual specialized area of study: body parts that went out the back door at UCLA. I subsequently did some searches in the LA Times, and suffice it to say, 'wow.' About your non-UFO interests, KK, I empathize. I have now come at alleged alien abduction from a variety of angles, leading me to realize the possible explanations over-arch into several areas of complex subject matter, a lot of which most people have neither the patience nor desire to understand more fully and more accurately. Not only does such subject matter require sustained and determined study, but a majority of abduction enthusiasts simply do not want to know more about it. Whether or not most are willing to accept it, ufology and areas of interest ufology bleeds into are not for those suffering from conspiracy-phobia. The affliction just handicaps one to being doomed to an incomplete view of actuality in several key areas. From what I have reviewed of your work, KK, related to mind control and its more socially friendly term 'behavior modification,' I would agree with your assessment that most of what you put forward is correct. I encourage you to comment on more of my work as you may feel inclined. I would also be most interested in reading a summary of your general thoughts and conclusions at this point, after having conducted the research and career as was the case in your situation. If the mood strikes you to summarize your conclusions about covert mind control research and its implications to ufology, I would most certainly want to read it. Please feel encouraged to email me directly now or in the future if you prefer. Thanks, Jack Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp