From: Elsie Conner <elsie_conner.nul> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 10:41:34 -0400 Archived: Sun, 27 May 2012 07:29:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Alien [MILAB?] Implants Closer To Detection? >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:01:22 +0000 >Subject: Re: Alien [MILAB?] Implants Closer To Detection? >>From: Kay Wilson <kaywilson.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 12:30:12 -0500 >>Subject: Alien [MILAB?] Implants Closer To Detection? >>Are alien abductees closer to locating (and hopefully removing) >>their Alien [MILAB?] Implants? >>http://tinyurl.com/cxdafx4 >>Thanks to Robert Morningstar for the lead. >Roger Tolces, private investigator, has been able to detect >implanted chips or electromagnetic charged environments for at >least 10 years. >If anyone wants to determine whether they are implanted, contact >Roger. He has a website. >Why leap to the conclusion the implant is alien? >I am more inclined to attribute the implantation to an MILAB >source than "alien." I say this because "alien" presence comes >off more ephemeral than solid. Therefore, I have to logically >conclude that anything solid is the work of very earthly >operations. Why leap to the conclusion that an alien presence is ephemeral? I have to logically conclude you don't know dink about alien abductions. E. Conner Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp