From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 00:38:48 +0100 Archived: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:13:56 -0400 Subject: Ancient Aliens Debunked http://tinyurl.com/9mpla2s I know the flaws in Von Daniken's works have been exposed years ago - all that stuff about UFO landing strips (since when have saucers needed runways?) and models of ancient planes which are obviously stylised birds. But I've fondly clung to the unsolveable mysteries of gigantic stone monuments that couldn't be moved without some lost technology. So when I settled down to watch this debunk of Ancient Aliens I expected it to be the usual narrow minded cherry picking from the sceptical crowd who can't think out of the box. I haven't watched all three hours yet but I found myself agreeing with just about all I viewed. I'm still not totally convinced that 800 ton blocks could have been moved just by brute force and cut to such precision with primitive tools - but who knows? I certainly don't anymore...... I do know it doesn't need aliens to make complex crop formations so maybe the good old human race can rustle up a pyramid or two with enough slaves to do the work..... For once I consider a sceptical piece provides a very valid 'balance' to a controversial TV series. But I'm interested whether others think so too. Dave Haith Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp