UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2012 > Sep > Sep 28

Re: Is NASA Faking Mars Images?

From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:49:43 +0100
Archived: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:12:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Is NASA Faking Mars Images?


>From: Viktor Golubic <Diverge247.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:42:41 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: Is NASA Faking Mars Imagaes?

>>From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul>
>>To: UFO UpDates <post.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:50:55 +0100
>>Subject: Is NASA Faking Mars Imagaes?

>>Hard to believe NASA could be this blatant or this obvious but
>>as a non-techie person, I found this YouTube video quite
>>convincing.

>>http://tinyurl.com/buoqppo

>>I note that Linda Moulton-Howe features this whole issue here:

>>http://tinyurl.com/c3a5jvl

>>I would be fascinated to learn what the boffins on this List
>>make of this.

>>Surely if anybody was going to copy and paste sections, they
>>wouldn't photoshop them into the same shots where they can be
>>easily identified?.

>Hi Dave,

>These are what I believe to be automated stitching errors. The
>two parallel swaths that should overlap can't because they were
>taken from slightly different orientations (and lighting
>conditions). The effects of the curvature progressively enhance
>these errors as we go north or south as well. As a result, the
>computer found enough individual differences to deem them
>distinct, then did the best job it could to weave the two
>together. Of course we as humans, notice instead what makes them
>more similar which results in a much better job at discovering
>the problem.

>I see the repeating error pattern and they are equidistant from
>one another. Until we can see around the entire planet it is
>impossible to determine whether the sequence is consistently in
>error or whether they are dispersed in some places and not in
>others. It all comes down to how the computer programs
>functions; But surely fabricating enough artificiality into the
>mix to successfully achieve such a blunder.

My grateful thanks to you Viktor - I knew somebody here was
likely to have an explanation.

I think I prefer the 'computer error' solution to NASA standing
for Never a Straight Answer!

 >I guess we have to first investigate whether these are official
>before progressing any deeper into the matter. I know a place to
>forward these - to hopefully get an official opinion.

I look forward to news from your official source.

Please post it here to enlighten us all and brighten NASA's
rather sketchy reputation.


Dave




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com