From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:49:43 +0100 Archived: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:12:02 -0400 Subject: Re: Is NASA Faking Mars Images? >From: Viktor Golubic <Diverge247.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:42:41 -0400 (EDT) >Subject: Re: Is NASA Faking Mars Imagaes? >>From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:50:55 +0100 >>Subject: Is NASA Faking Mars Imagaes? >>Hard to believe NASA could be this blatant or this obvious but >>as a non-techie person, I found this YouTube video quite >>convincing. >>http://tinyurl.com/buoqppo >>I note that Linda Moulton-Howe features this whole issue here: >>http://tinyurl.com/c3a5jvl >>I would be fascinated to learn what the boffins on this List >>make of this. >>Surely if anybody was going to copy and paste sections, they >>wouldn't photoshop them into the same shots where they can be >>easily identified?. >Hi Dave, >These are what I believe to be automated stitching errors. The >two parallel swaths that should overlap can't because they were >taken from slightly different orientations (and lighting >conditions). The effects of the curvature progressively enhance >these errors as we go north or south as well. As a result, the >computer found enough individual differences to deem them >distinct, then did the best job it could to weave the two >together. Of course we as humans, notice instead what makes them >more similar which results in a much better job at discovering >the problem. >I see the repeating error pattern and they are equidistant from >one another. Until we can see around the entire planet it is >impossible to determine whether the sequence is consistently in >error or whether they are dispersed in some places and not in >others. It all comes down to how the computer programs >functions; But surely fabricating enough artificiality into the >mix to successfully achieve such a blunder. My grateful thanks to you Viktor - I knew somebody here was likely to have an explanation. I think I prefer the 'computer error' solution to NASA standing for Never a Straight Answer! >I guess we have to first investigate whether these are official >before progressing any deeper into the matter. I know a place to >forward these - to hopefully get an official opinion. I look forward to news from your official source. Please post it here to enlighten us all and brighten NASA's rather sketchy reputation. Dave Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp