From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:15:20 -0700 Archived: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:11:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Brazilian MoD Discusses UFOs With Ufologists >From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:49:46 -0500 >Subject: Re: Brazilian MoD Discusses UFOs With Ufologists >Sadly, that you are making no visible effort to take your >"evidence" to those who could evaluate it and do something about >it - and clearly have no intention ever of doing so (all the >while, by the way, escalating the magnitude of your already >extraordinary claims by tossing wild conspiracy theories into >the mix) - tells us that even you have a pretty good >understanding of how much weight your "evidence" carries. By >which, of course, I mean how little. Jerry, You don't have the slightest notion of what my "evidence" carries. You've never studied it. Being an orderly and working in the ERs and surgeries of several large hospitals in Albuquerque and San Francisco during the late 1950s gave me an advantage when the Alien Autopsy footage was shown on Fox TV. It immediately caught my attention because of the authenticity of the surgical instruments and the body language of the surgeons and the surgical nurse. I decided to investigate it further. Those investigations eventually led to the monotreme hypothesis. I'm a nobody,(a special education teacher for thirty-five years). In 1989 I began writing a few short essays on environmental matters but I've never written a book, nor had any desire to be a superstar. Until the AA came into my life, I had only a minor interest in UFO matters. For the last eighteen years, I and a few other researchers have been collecting all information pertaining to the nature of the AA. Our most important discoveries were finding the crash site in Socorro the cameraman described and to which he gave directions, and the discovery of the Roswell crash site. I think this information is important to the understanding of UFO phenomena, but I realize that not many agree. It hasn't been easy trying to discuss a subject that everyone "knows" is a hoax. I've focused on you because, as I wrote you many years ago, if I can convince you to take another look, I can convince anyone. Besides, I can always count on you to respond. Is there something wrong with that strategy? But so far, I haven't been very successful. Not only have you refused to examine our evidence, but your demeaning tone has influenced others to ignore it as well. But there's always a hope for redemption so I'll try again. What are the problems with this "evidence"? http://alienautopsy-yes.com/creatures.html Ed Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp