From: David Biedny <dbiedny.nul> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:15:47 -0400 Archived: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:47:49 -0400 Subject: Re: A Journey Through The Past - Cox >From: Jim Deardorff <jimdeardorff.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:07:43 -0700 >Subject: Re: A Journey Through The Past - Cox >>Source: Billy Cox's Blog De Void >>http://tinyurl.com/mqecrs7 >>Monday, July 29, 2013 >>A Journey Through The Past >>By Billy Cox, Herald-Tribune >>Sometimes, having a dramatic UFO encounter really sucks, >>especially if you consider yourself a rational, left-brain, >>analytical thinker. Because when you go public with it, >>"skeptics," "believers," and everybody in between makes certain >>assumptions, and next thing you know is, you've got a label >>hanging around your neck and the rhetorical sludge gets so deep >>and ridiculous you need scuba gear to keep from drowning in it. >>"Remember that X-Files poster with the Billy Meier (beamship) >>photo, I Want To Believe? What the f*#! is wrong with people? >>They'll believe anything! Well, you know what? Wanting to >>believe is a lot different from wanting to understand. Two >>completely different things. And as an extreme experiencer who's >>also a skeptic, there's no way I can win. I'll never win this >>one. Never ever." >>This is an excerpt from a recent chat with David Biedny, the >>former co-host of The Paracast, a weekly webcast promoting >>discussions on various aspects of the paranormal. >>[More at site... ] >Some UFO UpDates Listers may need to be reminded that one cannot >always believe what Billy Cox proclaims. In this case, he >implied that the various Billy Meier beamship photos that became >X-file posters stamped I Want To Believe had been hoaxes of some >kind. Gaining an understanding of what's real and what's not can >require honest and comprehensive investigation by initially >unbiased investigators. This is just what the Meier case has >received over the past 35 years from Wendelle Stevens, Lee and >Brit Elders, Guido Moosbrugger, Gary Kinder, Michael Hesemann, >Jaime Maussan and Michael Horn. They found no way the case could >be a hoax. >However, those who want to believe the pro-hoax conclusions of >Kal Korff are free to do so. But I would urge they look into >the history of the Billy Meier debunkings starting in 1977; ebk >permitting, see: >http://www.tjresearch.info/Review_Clark.htm >where one will find that the reason for debunking was often of >the nature 'too good to be true', or too incredible relative to >20th-century science, or too unique and different, or too >politically incorrect. Billy Cox's feelings appear to lie in the >latter category... >Jim Deardorff Anyone who wants to believe in the Meier religious cult, deserves it and the people it attracts. The photographic 'evidence' is a bad joke, as are the 'prophecies'. To dive into granular detail on those issues is a massive waste of time, there is plenty of documentation to support those statements, for anyone who can be bothered to look. The list of people offered up by Mr. Deardorff speaks for itself, I need not add editorial comment, I'm too busy laughing. Any serious, sober researcher long ago wrote off the Meier nonsense. It's a non-starter for anyone but those looking for proxy religions and UFO newbies who don't know better. dB Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp