From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:43:19 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Archived: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 12:16:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Faster Than The Speed Of Light? >From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:04:17 -0400 >Subject: Re: Faster Than The Speed Of Light? >>From: Steve Sawyer <stevesaw.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:05:15 -0700 >>Subject: Faster Than The Speed Of Light? >>Dr. White believes that advances he and others have made render >>warp speed less implausible. Among other things, he has >>redesigned the theoretical warp-traveling spacecraft - and in >>particular a ring around it that is key to its propulsion system >>- in a way that he believes will greatly reduce the energy >>requirements. >As I mentioned before to the List, we may be seeing such a >propulsion system already in operation in this Hubble telescope >image. >http://www.treurniet.ca/tori/ufoP2010_A2Crop.htm >The UFO photos on the following pages show something similar. >http://www.treurniet.ca/tori/ufoindex.htm >http://www.treurniet.ca/torifract/torifract.htm <snip> Hi Everyone, I have been very busy these days with so many other projects, including further joint CSA-CNES high altitude research balloon flights to near Earth space launched from Timmins, Ontario. One of the exciting things we plan to do is confirm the unexpected findings of living micro-organisms in the upper atmosphere that do not resemble anything we know here on Earth which may turn out to be compelling evidence for the Panspermia Theory - that life on Earth (and the mysterious plagues over the centuries?) was seeded from space... I want to make a comment regarding this recent UFO UpDates post. If the assumptions we make that lead to new theories and the conclusions that result from these theories are based on actual observations but which were not interpreted correctly, then the scientific basis for these theories would be suspect. For example, regarding that small dark image in the picture with a rainbow, William state "...the unknown object and torus were fortuitously positioned over a rainbow. Spatial shifts in bands of color under the torus suggest that it refracted the light from the rainbow. This observation indicates that the space occupied by the torus has an index of refraction that is different from the surrounding space." and "...(2) that one end of the object appears to be covered by the distant rainbow." As rainbows are NOT fixed distant objects but are actually seen immediately in front of the observer (when the observer moves the rainbow moves in the same direction as the observer!). If rainbows were real objects far from an observer then they would appear stationary and at the same location to all observers, which they are not. Science advances forward and our knowledge and understanding of the cosmos (which we all are an integral part) increases by curious and independent thinking people like William who share their ideas and present their research for all to consider and contribute too.. Nick Balaskas Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp