UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2013 > Jan > Jan 14

Re: Artificial Intelligence

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:48:59 -0000
Archived: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:49:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence

>From: John Donaldson <John.Donaldson.nul>
>To: "post.nul" <post.nul>
>Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:09:27 +0000
>Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence

>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:17:59 -0000
>>Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence

>>>From: John Donaldson <John.Donaldson.nul>
>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:26:32 +0000
>>>Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence


>>Nope, as you can see my position is that 'morality' +/or
>>'ethics' are evolutionary outcomes which have developed
>>(because they
work) to increase a species chances of survival. It's as simple
as that.


>As our thread has already covered, the only argument you offered
>previously was that it is possible to explain the appearance of
>moral behaviour in the human species by appeal to evolutionary
>forces. I responded by pointing out that explaining the
appearance of moral behaviour in humans by appeal to evolutionary
forces does not in any count against the claim that there are
moral facts.


Hello John,

I can see where some get that idea: that 'moral facts' might
exist, maybe in the same way that some mathematicions believe
that all mathematical truths exist in a Platonic world on a
different plane to our earthly one. That's precisely why I can't
consider the concept: it's untestable, like all similar
'theological' or abstract theories.

However I can test - or at least ensure compatability with
researched biological, archeological and historical facts -
actual concrete evolutionary outcomes. The researched facts and
their high correlation with what we know know of human 'morals' -
and outcomes spread over recorded history - are listed under
various headings in the 'Altruist Survivor' pages.

So, purely pragmatically we can say there's a very high
probability that 'morals' are an evolutionary asset, and that
each species has (slightly) different basic morals, to aid
survival of that species.

However, AR Wallace pointed out "The separate species of which
the organic world consists being parts of a whole, we must
suppose some dependence of each upon all".

Which implies the existence of hard evolutionary (survival)
reasons for the additional, more complex 'morality' of
responsibility for all species on the planet. And that does seem
to be grasped by some forward-thinking folk these days.


Ray D

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com