UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2013 > Jul > Jul 2

Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty?

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:11:17 +0100
Archived: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 06:16:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty?


>From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:50:13 -0400
>Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty?

>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:48:44 +0100
>>Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty?

<snip>

>>No. it's not just a matter of accuracy, it's the fact that the
>>various elements can be affected in perhaps opposing ways and,
>>more serious, that the calibrating and measuring devices _will_
>>be affected too - probably cancelling-out any 'real' effect.

>Interesting suggestions, Ray, but this all started with the ETs'
>instructions to Wilbert Smith on how to design a measuring
>instrument for detecting regions of reduced binding force. Smith
>says, "we were informed that means for detecting them were
>easily within our technology and that we should build suitable
>instruments and then pay attention to what they registered."

>http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/BindingForce.htm

>Presumably, the ETs knew what they were talking about, and they
>did not share your concerns. Also, the device that Smith built
>did work. He found large areas where the meter showed
>significant deviations, as did a military pilot flying the North
>Atlantic. In the latter test, the "instruments took on a
>permanent deflection showing that the vortex drove them beyond
>their elastic limits".

>Smith acknowledged the calibration issue, but had to make do
>with an instrument that showed only qualitative differences
>among geographical locations. <snip>

Hello William,

Sorry I can't just accept other people's assumptions, as you do,
about best methods for detecting the binding force, or about the
reasonings and motivations of their sources - to me that's all
unknown territory.

All I can do is start from (fairly) solid ground by defining the
attributes of a binding force, their (graduated) effects on
particular states of matter, and hence some ways of detecting
those graduations of effect; hopefully in real-time and using
reliable, portable equipment.

Looking ahead it seems to me the 'best' and most accurate method
will involve monitoring the inertial behaviour of electrons -
which can probably be done in a 'pack-of-cards' sized module
(someone might even design an 'app' for a smartphone to do it).

I.e. as we see from many accounts and reports, the UFO/ET use of
the 'binding force' results in observed changes in
electromagnetic fields, both in car engines and in the brains of
nearby humans.


Cheers

Ray D




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com