From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:07:25 +0100 Archived: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:09:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Colin Andrews Re: We're Done Here, Now Go Away >From: Gerald O'Connell <goc.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:50:10 +0100 >Subject: Re: Colin Andrews Re: We're Done Here, Now Go Away - Cox >OK, a couple of issues relating to file AIR 2/16918: >1. The Bush/Hull case. Negatives were returned but there is >reference to images taken in the course of working on the >negatives. These images are not in the file. Yep, you're right - I eventually found the case you are talking about from the 1962/63 414-page file. The papers refer to 4 photographs, none of them included in the file. >2. The Henson/Taunton case. When interviewed by Nick Redfern, >Anne Henson said that the official who visited her to >investigate the case took photographs of objects/lights similar >to or the same as the ones she had reported. These are not in >the file. In the report from Sgt. Scott of P&SS, there is no mention of him taking photographs. He does say that on the nights he attended, the sky was overcast or the phenomenon wasn't apparent, so any photographs he might have taken would have been superfluous and simply not forwarded to S6. >It is obvious that that they cannot release what they haven't >got, but it is equally obvious that we cannot be sure that >haven't got things that they say they haven't got. There is >prima facie evidence that the release is either selective or >incomplete. If governments could be shown to be honest and >truthful, then it would be easy to accept their word. >Unfortunately, the evidence is to the contrary, and there will >always be doubt. I agree to some extent - as I wrote in my response to Colin Andrew's message, I don't like the fact that the MoD have been so careless with files which should have been safeguarded under the Public Records Act, and can fully understand why some people may be suspicious that the missing records contain something of significance. Unfortunately we will never know for certain whether they did or not, but based on the files so far released, I sincerely doubt that there would have been any smoking guns. The examples you provide underline my comment regarding the files not having contained any smoking guns - I can't see how denying the public an image of a sprocket tag or stars (explanations apparently accepted by the reporters at the time) is going to conceal the truth about alien visitation. Cheers, Joe Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp