From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:38:32 -0400 Archived: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 07:21:06 -0400 Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:13:28 +0100 >Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:24:30 -0300 >>Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>>From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>ate: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:28:33 -0400 >>>Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>>>To: <post.nul> >>>>Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:04:54 +0100 >>>>Subject: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>>>http://tinyurl.com/q6hc4ye ><snip> >>>>for a more rational assessment by astronomers. I.e that a >>>>really advanced civilization would think of us as lower than >>>>insects, more like bacteria. ><snip> >>>An advanced civilization should see all life as precious, >>>including insects and bacteria. One could say that is the >>>definition of "advanced civilization". ><snip> >>Rational? How absurd! Insects and bacteria cannot build nuclear >>weapons. We have exploded 2000. The biggest one released the >>energy of 50 Million tons of dynamite. ><snip> >Hello William and Stanton, I understand your pained >sensibilities and am not stating a personal opinion, only the >presented evidence to date. >In fact a personal opinion is difficult to state - or even form, >as, over recent years accumulating evidence has forced many folk >to make reappraisals. >I think there's three main areas: >1) Martyn Stubbs' disclosure of NASA films have shown that there >are extra-ordinarily large entities (maybe not engineered, non- >biological craft) visiting the Earth's atmosphere daily, >seemingly attended by small super-fast 'probes' or even 'scouts' >capable of interacting with human technology. >2) Research by Jacques Vallee et al seems to show that UFO/ET >phenomena have existed for centuries, and that a proportion of >such events are of a non-physical, highly subjective nature. >3) There are traces of several anomalous processes in our own >past, maybe extending into the present: >First the world-wide 'legend' of four previous races of humans, >dating from a pre-historic period when historians say world-wide >communication was 'impossible'. >Second the proven (but fearfully ignored) existence of humans >(or humanoids) with two or three times our brain capacity - the >so-called 'long-headed' rulers, whose impossibly large skulls >can be found around the world (as can the rather distorted >skulls of ordinary humans whose parents have apparently tried to >imitate the long-heads by manipulating or binding their babies' >skulls). >Third the unaccountable fact that some of the earliest >civilizations, where 'long-heads' were visible, seem to have had >strangely developed attributes: >I.e. early Egypt had superb architectural skills which they lost >over subsequent millennia, and even the British Museum commented >that "Egyptian writing... appears to come into use almost >'ready-made'". N.b. 'long-heads' are seen in New Kingdom skulls; >Akhenaten and others, plus (significantly) Nefertiti who was >apparently _not_ an Egyptian. >While Sumer, the shadowy and almost unknown founder or >predecessor of what would become Babylonia, had anomalous metal- >working skills and a mathematical system ideal for timekeeping >and astronomy (so good we still use it - i.e. base 60). Weirdly >their earliest imagery seem to be an 'ET Cult' of reptilian >long-headed rulers. >Other 'long-head' skulls are found from Siberia to the >Mediterranean (Malta's long-heads were/are hidden by >scientists), to the Americas - again dated to periods when >world-wide communication is deemed 'impossible'. >It's no good trying to compartmentalize those facts away from >consideration. Every scientific discovery from the Ionians >onwards has shown that Earth and humanity are less important >than we thought. >So it seems the situation isn't as neat as we might like. Yes, it's hard to understand why these dissonant facts and plenty of others are ignored. The activities of non-human beings on earth in prehistoric times conflicts with the assertion that triggered my initial response to this thread. That is, "a really advanced civilization would think of us as lower than insects, more like bacteria". These prehistoric beings apparently did not treat humans as insignificant insects. Rather, they seem to have given humans knowledge of science, technology and art. So it's the unwillingness to deviate from our "official" scripts that allows such ideas to be held by otherwise intelligent people. William Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp