From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:39:03 +0100 Archived: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:01:50 -0400 Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:38:32 -0400 >Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:13:28 +0100 >>Subject: Re: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>>>>To: <post.nul> >>>>Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:04:54 +0100 >>>>>Subject: ETs Probes Already In Solar System? >>>>>http://tinyurl.com/q6hc4ye <snip> >>>>>for a more rational assessment by astronomers. I.e that a >>>>>really advanced civilization would think of us as lower than >>>>>insects, more like bacteria. <snip> >>I think there's three main areas: >>1) Martyn Stubbs' disclosure of NASA films have shown that >>there are extra-ordinarily large entities (maybe not >>engineered, non-biological craft) visiting the Earth's >>atmosphere daily, seemingly attended by small super-fast >>'probes' or even 'scouts' capable of interacting with human >>technology. >>2) Research by Jacques Vallee et al seems to show that UFO/ET >>phenomena have existed for centuries, and that a proportion of >>such events are of a non-physical, highly subjective nature. >>3) There are traces of several anomalous processes in our own >>past, maybe extending into the present: <snip> >These prehistoric beings apparently did not treat humans as >insignificant insects. Rather, they seem to have given humans >knowledge of science, technology and art. So it's the >unwillingness to deviate from our "official" scripts that allows >such ideas to be held by otherwise intelligent people. Hello William, It would be nice if things were that simple - but they're not. Examining the historical and archeological record we see that the earliest civilizations where 'long-heads' were visible (or ruled) did indeed show precocious advanced attributes, but they also share an unnatural urge to organised warfare - the slaughter of men, women and children 'Unnatural' because we know (latest evidence only this week) that ordinary humans are 'peaceful'. That's reinforced by what we know of the pre-Greek Aegean (maybe 7,800 years old), the Indus Valley Civilization (7,000 - 8,000 years old) and from Catalhoyok, Turkey (up to 9,500 years old at lowest levels) which all show peaceful farmers, sailors and/or traders with egalitarian high quality housing and hygiene and no trace of palaces, barracks, slave-quarters or prisons. See: www.perceptions.couk.com/westward.html#koutroulou Whereas the so-called 'high civilizations' of Egypt, Mesopotamia, the later Aegean (the incoming 'Greek' tribes) and across in Meso-America, all 'empire-builders' (but not the earlier native or autochthonous folk) were apparently dedicated to regular mass-bloodshed either in organized warfare between armed groups or more often in the ruthless slaughter of native pastoralists by heavily armed 'soldiery'. [Most of the classical Greeks were actually little more than murdering cattle-thieves and slavers, on a grand scale - read Xenophon or Thucydides between the lines] The Meso-American groups, all showing reverence for 'long-head' symbology and imitation (by head-binding of human babies) were also dedicated to human sacrifice (on a huge and bloody scale for the Aztecs but others were close) and torture of captives to a degree which can only be described as psychopathic - accompanied as it was (esp. in the 'Mayans' - an ethnic misnomer IMHO) by self-torture by rulers and their wives (the 'King' is often shown dragging a sting-ray barb along his penis to draw lots of blood for a sacrifice, while their women are shown ripping their tongues open with similar barbs). If you wanted to risk generalizing you could say that 'natural humans' were/are relatively peaceful and egalitarian (after all what's the point of wanting more than a 'decent' level of consumption?) while those groups touched by the 'long-heads' (slaughtering, building palaces, using slave labour etc.) seem to act in ways dictated by the shape of those long-heads' skulls. Don't forget they had a cranial capacity two to three times that of a regular human being, but their receding foreheads meant little or no prefrontal lobe development (seat of our social behaviour - psychopaths have damage there) and the un-natural extension is mostly to the back of the head - seat of the cerebellum: rote-learned behaviour and fear, dominance reflexes. So, if ETs _have_ interfered with human physiological and social evolution over the millennia as you hinted, we can maybe hope that there was more than one ET group-ethos involved, as Admiral Hill-Norton was convinced, and that the _others_ allowed us more peaceful and egalitarian folk to evolve naturally. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp