From: Kathleen Marden <Kmarden.nul> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 07:24:29 -0400 (EDT) Archived: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 09:30:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Kathleen Marden on Coast to Coast >From: Jason Gammon <boyinthemachine.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:34:12 -0400 (EDT) >Subject: Re: Kathleen Marden On Coast To Coast >Ms. Marden, with all due respect and no offense intended, but at >the end of the show you were discussing "the astral plane", >"astral projection", and "raising one's vibrations". You were >discussing it because that's what your abductees told you, so >therefore it must be right, correct? You have left science >behind and have entered New-Age "woo-hoo" land. However, you can >make a u-turn and come back. I suggest you do so immediately. With reference to statements I made on Coast to Coast, I was speaking of information I received from 3 theoretical physicists that I had consulted regarding information that several experiencers had passed to me independently. I asked if it was scientifically possible and discussed the answers I received from them. Are you suggesting that these highly respected physicists who've worked at Harvard and MIT are out in woo woo land? There has been much discussion recently about other dimensions, parallel universes, and other planes of existence. It is all theoretical and highly speculative. But I've been asked to express an opinion about it, along with religious belief systems, so many times, that I included a discussion of alternative hypotheses, including psychological explanations, in the last chapter of "The Alien Abduction Files. In the past, I've refused to engage in this type of speculation, because I find it uncomfortable. But I have addressed it recently. What some consider mysticism, others consider science. It is in my gray basket. But I will discuss what others have hypothesized, when asked. I have certainly not thrown western scientific materialism out the window. I have merely stated that some abduction related phenomena cannot be adequately explained within the tenets of our current scientific paradigms. For example, how does one explain telepathic communication, light orbs, and passing through solid surfaces? We'd have to state that it is a figment of one's imagination. Yet, hundreds or thousands of individuals from around the world have described the same phenomena, in conjunction with UFO abductions. I disagree with your final assessment of abduction experiencers. There is consistency that you couldn't possibly have knowledge of. It is information that researchers, such as myself, hide from others. We use it as a ruler to measure the veracity of one's claim. I would never reveal this information. Just as an aside, approximately four years ago, Budd Hopkins and I discussed my book. I was apprehensive about writing it, but he urged me to proceed. I had a great deal of respect for Budd's work and the compassion and kindness that he carried for experiencers. We can learn much more from the well grounded, well educated, perceptive and scientifically knowledgeable experiencers that share their information with us quietly and anonymously, than we can from those who admonish us to watch out for the whackos. I've been involved in UFO and abduction research for 23 years and have three books and many essays to my credit. In addition to this, I have lectured across the United States, appeared as an on-camera expert on television shows, and made guest appearances on hundreds of radio shows. However, I'm not familiar with your work. Will you please send a list of your publications to me? Kathleen Marden Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp