From: Jason Gammon <boyinthemachine.nul> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 04:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Archived: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:29:55 -0400 Subject: Sarbacher's Hidden Message Or 'Learn Code' Dr. Sarbacher's Hidden Message Or 'How To Learn The Code' There are people in the know who have information on the government's knowledge of UFOs and who desperately want to communicate this knowledge but for various reasons simply can't openly state things. To get around they they speak and even write in a sort of code. The ease of understanding the code is probably indicative of the quality of the information. For example, when Kevin Randle asked Edwin Easley if they were on the right path (Roswell crash being extraterrestrial), Easley replied that he wasn't on the wrong path. That's and easy code to understand and so the information communicated is not that shocking. To give an example of a harder code to understand I would suggest we look at Dr. Sarbacher's 1983 letter http://www.roswellproof.com/Sarbacher_Nov1983.html Now, the information that I find of interest is on page 2, where Sarbacher discusses the "aliens". There are three things that stand out to me. These three things may indicate that Sarbacher was speaking a code in hopes of communicating information that he was not able to openly state. Those three things are; 1.) Sarbacher uses the term "instruments" to refer to the occupants of the crashed UFO. 2.) Sarbacher puts aliens in quotes, "aliens", as if to imply special significance. 3.) Sarbacher uses the term "constructed" instead of other terms such as born, evolved, possess, etc. So if Sarbacher was writing in code the translation of this information would be thus: "The occupants are manufactured, artificial beings. They were created by something else which we do not currently know." Going further, Sarbacher says that in talks with people he came to the conclusion that the beings were similar to insects. Sarbacher is also communicating something here as well. Now this can be tricky. If Sarbacher is referencing insects then perhaps he is communicating that the beings have an exoskeleton. However, unless these beings were the "insectoids" or "mantises" then abductees and witnesses do not generally report the beings having an exoskeleton. In fact, most abductees report the flesh of the beings as being soft, sometimes even squishy like marshmallows. So this is a stumper for sure. The only suggestion I can make is perhaps Sarbacher is using the word insect because he can't use a more proper word to describe the beings, such as robots, machines, or of what we would call a cyborg. So perhaps it's possible that Sarbacher wasn't able to use these terms openly and picked another word instead. Or perhaps the beings did have an exoskeleton. Now some researchers are already aware of the code, even if they didn't consciously acknowledge it before. For those researchers for whom the code is something brand new, I do challenge you to go back through transcripts of interviews and see if you can find information that perhaps the person was trying to communicate. I would suggest someone start with Dr. Eric Walker. I don't have access to any transcripts of his conversations but if Sarbacher is speaking in a code then there's a good chance Walker did as well. -Jason Gammon Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp